Rockefeller Foundation partners with WHO to find ‘climate pandemics’

The Rockefeller Foundation last week announced a new initiative with the World Health Organization to discover pandemics caused by “climate change”.

Rockefeller’s $5 million investment in the World Health Organization (WHO) Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence will “cultivate global networks” to detect pathogens and diseases “worsened by rising temperatures and extreme weather.”

But the globalist organization suggests that it will not only look for climate-induced pandemics, it will declare any new pandemic as having been caused by “climate change”.

“Climate change is increasing both the risk of another global pandemic and the need to collaborate and share data,” said Rockefeller Foundation President Dr. Rajiv Shah in a statement. “Fortunately, the WHO Pandemic Hub is already making us smarter and safer by helping track threats, find solutions, and connect countries and continents. We’re proud to partner with the Hub to expand its focus on preventing pandemics fueled by climate change.”

One of the tools that will be used to “detect” climate pandemics is data.org, an initiative founded by Rockefeller and Mastercard and funded by Microsoft, the United Kingdom government, and dozens of other partners.

Data.org runs the Capacity Accelerator Network (CAN), whose aim is to flood the public space with research showing how everything is impacted by “climate change” particularly health. In Africa, for example, where hundreds of thousands of people die each year from malaria, data.org will show how the disease’s parasites are affected by the weather. The malaria victims could then be said to have died from “climate change”. This will influence government policies.

By 2032, the organization hopes to build a one million-man army of operatives across several sectors. These operatives will use their positions to further the climate pandemic narrative. Academics will create the research and make it part of their curricula, media operatives will publicize it, social media censors will suppress debate on the issue and government lawmakers will create the policies.

“Through its Capacity Accelerator Network, or CAN, data.org is committed to training 1 million, purpose-driven data practitioners by 2032 through a global ecosystem of academic, philanthropic, social impact, government, and private sector partners,” explains a sponsored article from data.org. “The aim is to build talent to solve systemic challenges such as those at the intersection of climate change and health.”

The CAN initiative is already running in the US, Africa and, as of this month, in India as well.

“[O]ur number one objective is to create an accelerator — or a network of networks — within India that results in a unified ecosystem of practitioners, universities, government entities, and private sector organizations who are all focused on building talent to address systemic challenges across health and climate,” said data.org’s Chief Data and Technology Officer Uyi Stewart.

Rockefeller’s and the WHO’s climate-health agenda has already taken shape with One Health, an approach to healthcare which ties human health to “climate change”.

The stated pretext of One Health claims that because pandemic diseases are zoonotic and spread from animals to humans, human health must be looked at in the context of animals and the environment or what is called the “human-animal-environment interface”.

Rockefeller boasts the foundation “[s]trengthened connections between animal health, human health, and environmental health through the ‘One Health’ approach in recognition of the fact that the majority of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic in nature.”

The One Health approach has also been endorsed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which praised the ideology’s focus on climate change:

We will have a better chance of suppressing infectious diseases only if we adopt what the WHO calls a One Health approach and integrate predictive modelling and surveillance used in both infectious disease control and climate change.

In March, globalist governments met with the World Health Organization in Geneva to negotiate a “Pandemic Accord” that will bind all countries to the One Health approach.

The WHO’s Pandemic Accord requires governments to “address the drivers of the emergence and re-emergence of disease at the human-animal-environment interface, including but not limited to climate change, land use change, wildlife trade, desertification and antimicrobial resistance.”

One Health has already started making its way into US legislation. In December, Congress quietly passed the Advancing Emergency Preparedness Through One Health Act (HR 2061/S 681) which commissions the establishment of a One Health program. The heads of federal agencies such as the CDC, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense and others are ordered to submit a proposal for a One Health Framework to Congress within one year.

The Act says the first goal of the One Health Program is to prevent zoonotic diseases, which can only be done by focusing more on the environment and agriculture. The bill’s authors worry that zoonotic disease outbreaks may cause egg shortages which can in turn affect vaccine production.

“Public health preparedness depends on agriculture in a variety of ways,” reads the bill. “For example, a wide range of vaccines, including those for influenza, yellow fever, rabies, and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), are primarily cultivated in poultry eggs. Egg shortages resulting from zoonotic disease outbreaks could impose serious risks to vaccine manufacturing efforts."