New study shows COVID boosters increase COVID risk

A new pre-print study that examined the vaccination records of more than 51,000 Cleveland Clinic employees revealed that each additional mRNA injection increased the chance of contracting COVID. According to the study,

The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19. [Emphasis added].

Negative efficacy already known

The authors acknowledge that this is not the first time that “negative efficacy,” — i.e., an increased chance of infection following mRNA injections — was found.

This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. 

Another study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7]. [Emphases added].

Still surprised

Despite linking to previous studies showing the jabs’ negative efficacy, the researchers write that their results were “unexpected”.

The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. [Emphasis added].

Perhaps the surprise was due to the extent to which the efficacy was negative; triple dosed people were three times as likely to test positive for COVID than those who refused all jabs, as seen in the below chart. That is a vaccine efficacy of minus-200%!

Vaccinated ≠ immune 

When mRNA injections were first found to have failed in preventing the spread of COVID, as measured by the rate of positive COVID test results, the CDC needed to update the definition of “vaccine” to remove any mention of immunity. When news of the change spread, mainstream media did a fact check, finding the change to be real.

An archived CDC web page … shows that the agency’s previous definition of vaccine was “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”

The current definition on a CDC web page … reads: “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

The latest CDC definition is absent the word “immunity” and just focuses on the stimulation of the body’s immune response. 

Health officials were forced to make similar changes to the definition of “vaccination.”

The CDC also changed its wording for the definition of “vaccination” from “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease” in 2018 to “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.” 

The key differences here are, again, the absence of the word “immunity” in the latest definition and the change to “protection” instead.

Vaccinated = negative immunity? 

Now, even the new definition of a vaccine cannot be applied to the mRNA injections, as it still requires the production of “protection” from COVID. A drug that triples one’s chance of testing positive on a COVID test cannot be said to protect that person from COVID. This latest data necessitates a change along the lines of:

A vaccine is a preparation that is used to stimulate a response in the body.

New research grant applications

Whatever the CDC does with its vaccine definition, the researchers have already laid out the next steps, writing, as quoted above, that they only found, “a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19.” The finding of only a “possible association” means that new research will need to be carried out by these or other scientists.

The effect of multiple COVID-19 vaccine doses on future risk of COVID-19 needs further study.