Media amplify pandemic hysteria
Media operatives are reporting on several diseases which they say may be the next “threat to humanity,” setting the stage for a new pandemic.
“As the COVID-19 pandemic threat seemingly fades into the annals of history, scientists are attempting to identify which pathogen will pose the next large-scale threat to humanity,” reported Fortune last month.
The publication cited a study to suggest that Langya virus, a pathogen which causes respiratory disease, fever and fatal pneumonia, might be the next pandemic. Langya, which belongs to a family of viruses called henipavirus, has “the potential to cause a global health emergency—and with eerie similarities to the latest human coronavirus,” Fortune warned.
Henipaviruses, the article explained, kill around 70% of people who come in contact with them and are spread from animals to humans.
The report came three days after an article in NJ Advance Media warned that “Disease X” “could cause the next pandemic”.
Disease X, described as “a new disease agent unknown to medical science that likely does not have any treatments or vaccines,” is included on a shortlist of “priority diseases” by the World Health Organization (WHO), along with COVID-19.
EcoHealth Alliance, the organization which oversaw the gain-of-function coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and sparked the COVID-19 pandemic, has referred to Disease X as “the next pandemic”.
As with Langya virus, NJ Advance Media emphasizes that Disease X — or whatever name it assumes — will be a zoonotic virus transferred from animals to humans:
Most researchers believe the next “Disease X” will come from animals before infecting humans.
“If a ‘Disease X’ pathogen does evolve, it will likely be from a zoonotic RNA virus,” Adams said. “This means an RNA virus that resides in an animal will develop mutations that will allow it to infect human hosts.”
In May, mainstream media outlets began to raise the alarm about two poultry workers in the UK who had contracted H5N1.
“Bird flu could become the next human pandemic – and politicians aren’t paying attention,” read an op-ed published in The Guardian by Devi Sridhar, who serves on the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on the Health Industry. In 2018 Sridhar “predicted” a virus of animal origin would travel from China to the UK. She advocated for stronger UK lockdown measures and promotes testing as the way to “preserve your economy.”
“This is a disease with an estimated 50–60% fatality rate in humans, including children,” wrote Sridhar.
While the actual pathogen put forth by media operatives as the next “deadly pandemic” varies, they take care to emphasize that the disease will originate from animals.
Zoonotic viruses, according to the WHO’s One Health agenda, are traced back to “climate change”. A zoonotic outbreak would open the door for severe climate policies and mandates to “stop the spread”.
The stated pretext of One Health claims that because pandemic diseases are zoonotic and spread from animals to humans, human health must be looked at in the context of animals and the environment or what is called the “human-animal-environment interface”.
The One Health approach has also been endorsed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which praised the ideology’s focus on climate change:
We will have a better chance of suppressing infectious diseases only if we adopt what the WHO calls a One Health approach and integrate predictive modelling and surveillance used in both infectious disease control and climate change.
In March, globalist governments met with the World Health Organization in Geneva to negotiate a “Pandemic Accord” that will bind all countries to the One Health approach.
The WHO’s Pandemic Accord requires governments to “address the drivers of the emergence and re-emergence of disease at the human-animal-environment interface, including but not limited to climate change, land use change, wildlife trade, desertification and antimicrobial resistance.”
One Health has already started making its way into US legislation. In December, Congress quietly passed the Advancing Emergency Preparedness Through One Health Act (HR 2061/S 681) which commissions the establishment of a One Health program. The heads of federal agencies such as the CDC, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense and others are ordered to submit a proposal for a One Health Framework to Congress within one year.
The Act says the first goal of the One Health Program is to prevent zoonotic diseases, which can only be done by focusing more on the environment and agriculture. The bill’s authors worry that zoonotic disease outbreaks may cause egg shortages which can in turn affect vaccine production.
“Public health preparedness depends on agriculture in a variety of ways,” reads the bill. “For example, a wide range of vaccines, including those for influenza, yellow fever, rabies, and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), are primarily cultivated in poultry eggs. Egg shortages resulting from zoonotic disease outbreaks could impose serious risks to vaccine manufacturing efforts."
