Massive cyber pandemic or massive false flag hack
For years, the Global Future Council on Cybersecurity of the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been warning of the inevitability of a COVID-like global cyber-pandemic. They even simulated one last year. We know from experience that when the WEF simulates a pandemic, it’s time to buckle up.
According to a WEF video, “The only way to stop the exponential propagation of a COVID-like cyber threat is to fully disconnect the millions of vulnerable devices from one another and from the Internet. All of this in a matter of days.”
The WEF claims to want to prevent this and therefore calls for international collaboration between all stakeholders, public and private, to institute policies and procedures that would prevent the cyber pandemic from occurring.
Put simply, once a cyber pandemic is underway there is no recourse but to disconnect everyone from each other and from the Internet. Therefore, we need to develop technologies and policies to prevent this from happening.
A few questions come to mind.
1) Is it possible to prevent a cyber pandemic?
If we are comparing cyber pandemics to biological ones, then let’s see how successful we were at stopping the coronavirus. If the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us anything it is that we as a global society are not up to the task of preventing the spread of a virus. COVID-19 spread from country to country and from person to person, regardless of lockdowns, masks and finally vaccines.
Some have called into question the logic of trying to prevent the spread of a virus saying that it’s like trying to stop a hurricane. It cannot be done. At most, we have the tools to greatly mitigate the damage a hurricane can cause. Maybe trying to stop the spread of the coronavirus, or any virus is wrongheaded. It cannot be done. Better to focus on mitigating the damage. And there is plenty that can be done to mitigate the damage of a virus. Top on the list is early treatment.
2) Who gets to pull the plug?
Who decides when a cyber-pandemic is underway and then who decides to disconnect all the vulnerable areas/devices? Will there be an overriding body like the UN or the WEF or some other entity to which governments will give up their autonomy?
If this capability exists, can it be used by bad actors including governments to shut populations out of the Internet, preventing people from communicating or even preventing them access to their bank accounts?
3) The WEF makes it very clear that the only way to prevent a global cyber pandemic is to reject fragmented approaches to cybersecurity. Only global collaboration will work. Global collaboration is a nice platitude. What does it mean in practice? Will policies be foisted upon us the way they were foisted upon us during the COVID-19 pandemic? Will technocrats, unaccountable to anyone but themselves, make decisions that bind us?
4) According to an article published by the WEF, listed under global cybercrime predictions for 2022, we find, ‘fake news 2.0 and the return of misinformation campaigns.” The article states that, “The claim of ‘fake news’ surrounding contentious issues has become a new attack vector over previous years without people really understanding its full impact. Throughout 2021, misinformation was spread about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination information.”
Again, we must ask, who defines “misinformation”? Who defines “fake news”? As we've pointed out in a previous article, last year’s misinformation is this year’s conventional wisdom.
Also, what is the cybercrime? The article enlightens us. “The black market for fake vaccine certificates expanded globally, now selling fakes from 29 countries. Fake ‘vaccine passport’ certificates were on sale … and the volume of advertisement groups and group sizes publishing sellers multiplied within the year.”
The cybercrime is the black market for fake vaccine certificates and fake vaccine passports.
Historically, black markets have arisen to fill the gap of no legal recourse. During the Prohibition period in the United States, a huge black market for alcoholic beverages arose. Once alcoholic beverages became legally available, with the repeal of Prohibition, the black market disappeared.
The concept of a vaccine certificate, essentially forcing people to share personal medical information with others is anathema to people living in the United States. Vaccine passports, as well, is in practice, discrimination based on a medical decision. The 1923 Supreme Court recognized that the liberty given in the 14th Amendment guarantees relatively broad rights of privacy regarding, among other things, personal medical decisions.
To label a black market for vaccine certificates, which are almost certainly illegal, a cybercrime, is stretching the meaning of cybercrime to fit a globalist agenda.
The one thing that every recommendation of the WEF has in common is that pushes a globalist agenda that sacrifices our personal freedoms to the god of technocracy. This agenda is its raison d’etre. In a previous article, we expanded on the WEF’s purpose and how it does not bode well for people who are averse to having their liberties taken from them.
Now, it has been reported that, British cyber intelligence is on high alert anticipating that hackers will infiltrate remaining Ukrainian networks, NATO systems or Whitehall computers.” Also reported, that Russia has developed “COVID for computers” which uses porn to disable laptops and phones. Fear grows in the UK of a cyber-attack.
Finally, last August a Twitter account called LaserHodl tweeted this:
#CyberPandemic hypothesis.
1. Massive false flag hack.
2. NATO triggers Article 5 for the 2nd time ever (1st was 9/11).
3. #GreatReset allies together against cyber terrorism.
4. Calls for #DigitalIdentity only internet.
5. Great Firewall of the West!
"Vaccinate the internet." pic.twitter.com/3Sq8Mvddav
— LaserHodl ????✨ (@LaserHodl) August 21, 2021
With the situation in Ukraine and the West’s reactions to the Russian invasion, we are currently on the brink of predictions 1, 2, and 3. Actually, prediction #1 may have already happened to an extent when Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp experienced global disruptions last summer.
LaserHodl’s prescience was too much for Twitter, so they canceled his account. Out of sight, out of mind.
