Global vaccine messianists - saviors or murderers? Part 1

Blood money
noun
1: money obtained at the cost of another's life
2: money paid (as by a killer or the killer's clan) to the family of a person who has been killed

Messianists and misinformation

[T]he whole concept of misinformation is very destructive and the reason why it's destructive is at some point you have to get to the point of who gets to decide what misinformation is . . . I think that there is no better way to have an open scientific debate and having all the opinions until the evidence is pointing to what is the truth . . . [W]hat is happening over the last three years … centralized organizations with a lot of interests, tech companies, governments that have an interest . . . are committed to certain narratives, [and] are trying to dictate to us what information is and what misinformation is . . .

MIT professor Retsef Levi speaking with Clayton Morris on Redacted with Clayton Morris podcast^[1]

It is quite evident that vaccine messianists do not want an open scientific debate; being self-declared arbiters of misinformation and disinformation helps them keep “certain narratives” alive and the public continuously vaccinated with dangerous and admittedly ineffective COVID-19 vaccines that are still under emergency use authorization.

What are those interests that still motivate them to keep this “pandemic” of dubious origin alive?

Could it be the “Ivory Tower” effect?

Kevin Bass, M.S., a 7th-year M.D./Ph.D. student at a Texas medical school, attributes this to the hubris of “elite” scientists which caused them to misinform the public about COVID-19, resulting in deadly consequences. Bass wrote about it in a Newsweek op-ed as reported by The Defender:^[2]

“I was wrong,” he wrote. “We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.”

. . .

But now it is clear the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration “repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public” about a wide range of topics — including but not limited to natural immunity, the need for school closures, the effectiveness of masks and vaccine safety and effectiveness, Bass said.

The biggest mistake of all, he argued, was made by a scientific community that fell in lockstep behind these institutions without concern for the needs of the broader public.

The privileged elite who made these policies — members of academia, government, medicine, journalism, tech and public health — failed to understand that critics from outside of their social class could possibly hold a valid point of view, . . .

The outcome of their approach to policymaking is a “massive and ongoing loss of life” due to loss of faith in the healthcare system, spiking rates of mental illness, increased suicide and gun violence, a catastrophic loss of education disproportionately experienced by the poor, and a loss of trust in healthcare, scientific authorities and political leaders, he said.

“We crafted policy for the people without consulting them,” Bass wrote. “If our public health officials had led with less hubris, the course of the pandemic in the United States might have had a very different outcome, with far fewer lost lives,” he concluded. [Emphasis added]

Didn't Bass find it curious that all three institutions repeatedly misinformed the public about everything related to the pandemic?^[3]

Did he not wonder why journalists and tech people would be involved in making any of these policies?

Is Bass correct that it is just about ego and they do not understand that critics outside their social class could possibly have a valid point of view?

Perhaps if it were just a few critics, or the information was previously unknown, we could understand how they let their egos get the best of them. These institutions, however, are supposed to be responsible to the public; medicine is supposed to be individualized, not practiced by decree; and this is not the first (presumed) epidemic these institutions have dealt with.^[4] Furthermore, not only are some of the critics from their own social class, but the scientific community has been in lockstep with these and related institutions for decades.

Ego or evil?

Not long after the pandemic's start, America's Frontline Doctors founder Dr. Simone Gold, a practicing ER physician at the time, shared with the world that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an effective remedy for the virus. Did she know something the “elites” didn't? Let's investigate.

Frontline News (FN) article ‘The crime and punishment of Dr. Simone Gold’, which refutes MedPage Today writer Cathy Clark’s hit piece on Dr. Gold, encapsulates the way in which the pandemic response was orchestrated in the United States. In it, FN supplies evidence that the FDA, Pfizer, and “saviors” like Drs. Fauci and Baric, who call for physicians to prescribe Remdesivir, an expensive drug known to increase the risk of death by 3%, knew all along the importance of early treatment and the safety and effectiveness of the cheap remedies that they vilified, recommended against, and prohibited. Evidence, provided from their own studies, proves that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin (zinc ionophores) and zinc are prophylactic and effective treatment for COVID-19, as well as for poliovirus, influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, and several picornaviruses (which cause respiratory tract infections), Hantavirus, Ebola, and Marburg virus.

This is related in section 5f, entitled ‘Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin in the medical literature’ and included in a subsequent article ‘Cheap drugs, cheap nutrients treat disease say, Fauci, Baric, FDA’. This article also brings stunning proof from the scientific literature that God's natural remedies and proper nutrition provided in the plant world promote health, obviating the need for many vaccines and drugs, and obliging us to take back responsibility for our own health.

In “Crime and punishment” FN also provides evidence that the vaccine messianists who foisted deadly treatments on people knew of the likely harms which would be experienced by those injected with the COVID-19 vaccines even before they were rolled out, and were well aware of the serious adverse events (AEs) reported after millions of people were injected with them. This is detailed in section 5g, entitled “Harms, deaths, and hospitalizations”. The following is excerpted from that section.

• In April 2020 Bill Gates was interviewed on CNBC's Breaking News program, where he let the world know that the vaccines were not without significant danger. He detailed the impossibility of making a safe, one-size-fits-all vaccine and said that hundreds of thousands of people would suffer from the vaccine and they wouldn’t vaccinate anyone until countries indemnified the manufacturers. That means that the manufacturers would have no liability for any injuries and deaths caused by the vaccines. Watch Bill Gates explain this in the video below at 2:38.

• Published November 2020, Jerusalem Post writer Maayan Jaffe-Hoffman reported that health and government authorities were going ahead with the vaccine campaign despite concerns about the unknown effects of mRNA vaccines including possible systemic inflammatory conditions that could lead to autoimmune diseases and “toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components,” saying “[t]here is a race to get the public vaccinated, so we are willing to take more risks.” For this reason, one of the individuals she interviewed said she would wait a year before deciding if she was going to get the vaccine.
• December 1, 2020, ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed a petition with the European Medicine Agency (EMA) to halt introduction of the vaccines until the safety and efficacy concerns they detailed in the petition were addressed.
• December 10, 2020, the FDA revealed, at its advisory meeting, a CDC Safety Surveillance list of 22 possible serious adverse effects from the vaccines including convulsions/seizures, myocarditis/pericarditis, Guillain-Barre syndrome (paralysis), thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), disseminated intravascular coagulation (a serious condition in which blood clots form throughout the body, blocking small blood vessels), pregnancy and birth outcomes, and death.
• Published February 8, 2021, the Daily Exposé reported that according to the UK Yellow Card Scheme (an adverse event vaccine reporting system).

[W]ith the rise in vaccines administered came a rise in adverse reactions with 49,472 reported reactions to the Pfizer vaccine and 21,032 reactions to the Oxford / Astrazeneca vaccine. For both vaccines this equates to 1 in every 333 people suffering an adverse reaction. This rate could actually be higher as some cases may have not been reported to the Yellow Card Scheme.

They highlighted the following:

5 people are now blind and a further 31 have had their vision impaired. In total there have been 634 eye disorders reported so far. Imagine being confined to the same four walls for over a year and not being able to see family or friends. Then getting excited because you naively think an experimental “vaccine” is going to give you your life back and allow you to see them once more. But then leaving [you] without the ability to ever see anything ever again.

There have also been 21 cerebrovascular accidents thanks to the experimental Pfizer vaccine. A cerebrovascular accident is the sudden death of some brain cells due to lack of oxygen when the blood flow to the brain is impaired by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain. A cerebrovascular accident is also referred to as a stroke.

• In April 2021 the Israeli People’s Committee released its first report.

The report, which discussed the deaths and other adverse effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, was reviewed by COVID Call to Humanity.

• Published August 27, 2021, by the Cov19 Longhaul Foundation, This article referred to the study published as a preprint on medRxiv.org. It was subsequenlty published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases after peer review. Julian Conradson reported on

[a] new study out of Israel has seemingly confirmed that individuals who have natural immunity have better protection against the NEW DELTA VARIANT than people who are fully vaccinated. . . .

Not just a little bit better either. People who have taken both doses of the Pfizer jab are 13 TIMES more likely to have a breakthrough infection, and are even at a “greater risk for Covid-19 hospitalizations.” (Emphasis added.)

The study also showed they were 27 times more likely to experience symptoms.

As Pfizer CEO Ablert Bourla told the world, Israel was Pfizer’s lab, with the dubious distinction of being the first country to vaccinate a large majority of its citizens and the country looked to for data regarding vaccine safety and adverse events.

(In 2004, Dr. Fauci said that getting the flu virus was the best protection anyone can get and if you really got the flu then there was no need for a vaccine.)

• Published November 14, 2021, Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz informed the public about a tremendous increase in hospitalizations and deaths from infection and illness among the vaccinated. Watch Horowitz's announcement and the media discussion which ensued below. (English subtitles.)

• On January 31, 2022, first batch of Pfizer documents released to the public.

The Pfizer “data dump” — documents the company was forced to release in order to comply with a FOIA request (after a judge ruled against the FDA’s request to keep those records confidential for 75 years) — showed that just 2½ months after the vaccine’s release to the market tens of thousands of serious adverse events were reported to the company. Pfizer and the FDA hid this from the public and continued with the vaccination campaign. The following numbers are from their document ‘5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports’. Marked confidential, the document identified by FDA document number FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0000054. Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404), Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866), and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries.

• Published March 2, 2022, by Rebel News writer Tamara Ugolini, reporting on the Pfizer documents, stated the following:

. . . the APPENDIX: List of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) totals over eight pages in length. It’s a monstrosity of a list but a search for “death” yields neonatal death and sudden unexplained death.

• Published May 20, 2022, in Citizen’s Journal by Michael Nevradikis, Ph.D., who questioned why, in the most recent data dump

. . . despite the occurrence of a wide range of symptoms, including serious cardiovascular events, almost none were identified as being “related” to the vaccine.

• Published July 9, 2022, by React19 — a list of 1,250 peer reviewed studies documenting vaccine injuries.

News related to vaccine injuries and deaths that made headlines after “Crime and punishment” was published include:

• an admission by Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner Jordon Trishton Walker that Pfizer was concerned about anomalies in women’s cycles as a result of the vaccine. Caught on hidden camera by Project Veritas, he said:^[5]

"There is something irregular about the menstrual cycles. So, people will have to investigate that down the line.”

Walker: “The [COVID] vaccine shouldn’t be interfering with [menstrual cycles]. So, we don’t really know.”

Walker: “I hope we don’t find out that somehow this mRNA lingers in the body and like -- because it has to be affecting something hormonal to impact menstrual cycles.”

Walker: “I hope we don’t discover something really bad down the line.”

Walker: “If something were to happen downstream and it was, like, really bad? I mean, the scale of that scandal would be enormous.”

• the Swiss attorney general's accepting a criminal lawsuit against its president filed by retired banker Pascal Najadi. Najadi brought charges of Abuse of Office under Article 310 of the Swiss Criminal Code against Swiss President Alain Berset, who was also the country's former Minister of Health, because of their vaccine policies.^[6]

In the video below Najadi discusses the suit and how he came to bring it.

• data from New Zealand which shows that the COVID-19 vaccine increases your likelihood of dying from COVID-19.^[7]
• the FAA's secretive decision to relax pilot EKG limits, raising concern that this unusual step, which can compromise air travel safety, is due to the great number of pilot vaccine injuries.^[8]
• the UK charging Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla with “five counts of breaches of three Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) codes that require information and claims to be accurate, balanced, capable of substantiation, not raising unfounded hopes of successful treatment, and not be misleading with respect to the safety of the product” for making “misleading” and unsubstantiated statements about the value of COVID-19 vaccines for young children.^[9]

What motivates vaccine messianists?

As Bass wrote and the above confirms, these “saviors” have blood on their hands. What do you think – are they egoistic “elites” or murderers? To answer the question, FN will provide some insight into what's driving the “messianists' murder machine” in part-2.

‍