Depopulation center wants children aborting babies
A Planned Parenthood depopulation center in Massachusetts is hoping to decrease birth rates by allowing young girls to seek abortions without their parents’ consent.
In an interview last week with WBUR, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Chief Executive Dominique Lee said her “number one priority” is “making abortion more accessible” in Massachusetts. To do that, Lee believes girls younger than 16 should be able to seek abortions without their parents’ consent.
After the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2020, Massachusetts lawmakers reacted by passing the ROE Act which lowered the consent age for abortion from 18 to 16. The law also allows abortion after 24 weeks.
But Lee says that is not enough.
“The parental consent requirement was reduced from age 18 to 16, but even 16 is still too high,” said Lee last week. “There’s no evidence that it’s medically necessary. On average, it just delays care anywhere from five to 21 days. That’s really critical when someone is deciding what options they have to choose, whether that’s medication abortion through the pill method or in-clinic surgical abortion.”
Lee’s proposition is part of a major depopulation design which began several decades ago with the Jaffe Memo.
In 1969 an economist named Frederick Jaffe devised a set of proposals to limit US population growth which continue to be put into practice today. Jaffe, who at the time was vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, had created the plan at the request of Bernard Berelson.
Berelson was the head of the Population Council, an organization founded by John D. Rockefeller III in 1952 to stifle population growth in the United States. Until today the Population Council concerns itself with researching contraception and other ways to prevent births, such as the Copper T intrauterine device. Since then an estimated 50 million Copper Ts have been distributed to over 70 countries.
In 1969, Berelson was looking for ideas.
Jaffe rose to the occasion and responded with what would later become known as the Jaffe Memo. In it, Jaffe proposed a set of actions which he believed could stem the US birth rate, beginning with pushing more women into higher education and the workforce.
“[T]he relationship between employment of women and lower fertility seems well established,” wrote Jaffe. He said that full employment is accompanied by higher inflation, a sacrifice the US may need to make in order to depopulate. “How much inflation could or should we risk to achieve lower fertility?” he asked.
Today, getting more women to enter the workforce is a strategy tirelessly adopted by globalist bodies such as the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (WEF). The UN is known to encourage women’s participation in the labor force at nearly every opportunity, even turning it into a public health issue.
Jaffe proposed other strategies which he compiled into a table titled “Proposed measures to reduce fertility by universality or selectivity of impact in the US.” These included encouraging increased homosexuality and placing “fertility control agents in the water supply.”
Common pesticides have been found to not only dramatically affect fertility but to feminize males. In one study of the pesticide atrazine, most male frogs exposed to the toxin became attracted to other males, including some who began functioning as females and produced eggs. Most atrazine produced in the United States is manufactured by Syngenta, a company owned by the Chinese Communist Party.
These pesticides, which have been detected in water supplies across the US, have recently been credited with reducing the sperm count in men by 50% over the last 50 years.
Other depopulation techniques proposed by Jaffe included restructuring the family so that marriage is postponed or avoided altogether. He also listed compulsory education for children and government incentives for lower birth rates as possible effective methods. Another entry listed among the proposed measures simply reads “chronic depression” with no further explanation.
Discouraging private home ownership is also one of the proposals, and a cornerstone of the WEF’s Agenda 2030 which promises taxpayers they will “own nothing and you’ll be happy.”
Jaffe also proposed to “allow harmless contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically,” to “make contraception truly available and accessible,” and to provide “abortion and sterilization on demand,” which Lee and her colleagues at Planned Parenthood are working to achieve to the fullest extent.
“The hypothesis underlying these proposals is that the achievement of a society in which effective contraception is efficiently distributed to all, based on present voluntary norms, would either result in a tolerable rate of growth, or go very far toward achieving it,” Jaffe wrote. “If this hypothesis is basically confirmed, it would negate the need for an explicit U.S. population policy which goes beyond voluntary norms.”
In the year the Jaffe Memo was produced, then-President Richard Nixon proposed the creation of a presidential advisory commission which would be tasked with creating a plan to solve the “population problem.” The next year, Nixon established the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, on which sat both Jaffe and Berelson.
Those of Jaffe’s proposed measures which have been enforced have been adopted by all major globalist organizations utterly, where homosexuality, abortion, birth control, and women in the workplace are all encouraged under the banner of “gender equality.”
Today, the Population Council’s website focuses on gender equality, abortion on demand, and even “climate change” as a determinant of “reproductive health and fertility.”
Other globalist bodies have been investing heavily in bringing the Jaffe Memo to realization, particularly through an organization called FP2030.
In July 2012, a meeting in London was convened by USAID, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The goal of the meeting was “to empower the voluntary use of modern contraception by 120 million additional women and girls in the world’s lowest-income countries by 2020.” An organization called Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) was formed.
FP2020 soon recruited over 130 governments, organizations and corporations to join the cause. Drug companies like Pfizer and Bayer pledged to provide birth preventive products all around the world.
As 2020 approached, FP2020’s founders evidently deemed it so successful that they renewed it for another decade and renamed the organization FP2030. Its globalist managers include North America and Europe Managing DIrector Monica Kerrigan, MPH, who previously worked for Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and USAID.
In 2021, FP2030 received $1.4 billion from government funding alone, with over $500 million annually from USAID.
When starting a birth prevention campaign in a target country, FP2030’s founding organizations first contact an official in that country’s Health Ministry. They present the official with a strategy containing high-impact practices (HIPs) for preventing births on a mass scale and provide them with the funds to do it.
However, FP2030’s goal is not simply to make birth prevention devices available, but to convince women to take them. Therefore, any mass birth prevention strategy must “improve attitudes.”
One of the main vehicles used for changing minds and attitudes towards birth prevention is mass media. In a 2016 High Impact Practices Partners’ meeting attended by FP2030 operatives, organizations were encouraged to “[u]se one or more mass media channels (radio, TV, print) to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and self-efficacy, and encourage social change to effect family planning.”
Another part of the strategy is using gender confusion ideology to prevent mass births. Whereas men and women naturally breed, masculinizing women and effeminizing men — contravening “gender norms” — is an effective way to stagnate a population.
“For FP2030, an intentional approach to gender equality makes our work more effective in advancing both family planning and gender equality,” says an FP2030 presentation titled “FP2030 Gender Strategy.”
The organization plainly states that “[g]ender norms . . . create barriers to FP access” and “[w]ith greater funding and scale, gender-transformative approaches will advance gender equality and accelerate progress on contraceptive access and use.”
In countries where birth prevention rates are stagnant, FP2030 says gender ideology, or “positive gender norms,” can be “more effective”:
In countries where contraceptive prevalence has plateaued, demand-side interventions promoting positive gender norms can be more effective than supply‑side approaches.
Gender Strategy notes that feminist operatives are also very helpful in driving birth prevention.
This may also explain why US intelligence agencies are heavily funding gender confusion around the globe through “Pride” organizations and events.
Such gender confusion — where women are masculinized and men are effeminized — is also achieved by birth prevention drugs themselves. According to scientific evidence, women who take birth prevention pills are likely to find more effeminate men attractive and themselves less attractive. They are also more likely to be sexually dissatisfied and cheat on their partners. If the woman wants to conceive, she can cease taking the pill which may make her lose interest in her partner, potentially fragmenting the family if a child is conceived.
The desire among globalists to prevent births is aggressive. Even though certain birth preventive injections can increase the risk of HIV, for example, the World Health Organization (WHO) still recommends it be provided to women.
“WHO advises that women should not be denied the use of progestogen-only injectables because of concerns about the possible increased [HIV] risk,” reads an FP2020 report. Women should be made aware of the increased risk of HIV, it continues, but they should also be told there is “uncertainty over a causal relationship.”
Vaccination is also included in FP2030's mass birth prevention strategy.
Nepal’s government, for instance, “is developing an integrated care strategy that includes family planning and immunization integration. Progress is being made on ensuring that post-abortion family planning is regularly offered.” FP2030 funds to Nepal also go towards “employing mass media to reach youth, ethnic minorities, and marginalized and disadvantaged groups with family planning information.”
Ultimately, FP2030 has been successful. One in three women of reproductive age is now using birth prevention products, boasts the organization, with the sharpest increase in Sub-Saharan Africa. As of July 2022, an estimated 371 million women and girls around the world are using birth prevention.
Notably, this is in addition to birth prevention products used by men.
