6 Reasons to keep fighting the COVID narrative
"Everyone already decided whether to take the jab, why keep talking about it?” Here’s why it’s still critical to get the facts out about how the danger from the virus was greatly exaggerated while the danger from the vaccine was hidden from the public.
1. To protect minority children from school expulsions
School districts with the highest percentage of black students are continuing and even expanding vaccine mandates. The result is biased policies where black children are far more likely to be kept out of school, widening racial learning gaps even as school districts demand more taxpayer funding to close those very gaps.
Outkick reports, for example, on Washington D.C., where 90% of students in government schools are minority children, and New Orleans (92% minority students):
Vaccine mandates in general, are indefensible.
Vaccine mandates for children are even more indefensible.
Unfortunately, numerous locations throughout the country are continuing to impose and potentially enforce these mandates on kids, contrary to all available scientific evidence and data.
Washington, D.C. has announced its vaccine mandate for those over 12 years old, which will keep substantial numbers of minority students out of school …
But New Orleans is one-upping the city by bringing the age bar down lower. Beyond 12 year olds, the city is requiring kids as young as 5 to receive two vaccination doses … nearly half the students in the city could be excluded from in-person schooling.
The disparate racial impact is all but guaranteed:
These policies will accomplish nothing other than furthering already disastrous educational results in recent years … “there is ample evidence that online schooling and pandemic education have been an abject failure—especially for black students. At the end of the 2020-21 school year, students of all races had fallen behind by an average of four months in reading and five months in math. For students in low-income schools, the learning loss was closer to seven months. Remote learning widened the white-black achievement gap that had been closing for 30 years.”
In short, minority parents,
who make the entirely reasonable and defensible decision to avoid a shot with minimal efficacy and potential for negative side effects will now see their children punished due to biased, purposeful incompetence.
The policy makers, on the other hand, generally have the wherewithal to send their children to private schools unaffected by their mandates.
The more that COVID falsehoods are exposed, the more difficult it will be to impose school mandates for vaccines as well as masks, testing, and quarantines.
2. To thwart plans for climate lockdowns
The Guardian ran a headline for a short time declaring “Global lockdown every two years needed to meet Paris CO2 goals – study.”
Although the headline was quickly changed to, “Equivalent of Covid emissions drop needed every two years - study,” the Guardian did not offer any ideas on how to limit emissions from factories, businesses and automobiles to the level of a lockdown without actually having a lockdown. So the change appears merely semantic and lockdowns remain the goal. The threat itself, of lockdowns, may also be a goal of such talk, as put forward in an opinion piece from MarketWatch:
Under a “climate lockdown,” governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently. [Emphasis added].
Some even see COVID lockdowns as paving the way for climate lockdowns.
Is it a coincidence that the two fears employed in an attempt at acquiescence to locking down civilian populations, health and global warming, are both based on allegedly scientific claims? How do science-based claims differ from other types of claims?
When one doesn’t do well on a history exam, the response is generally something along the lines of, “I didn’t spend enough time reviewing the causes of World War I,” not, “No matter how many times I read the causes I’ll never be able to write them down on a test.” This is quite different from biochemistry and physics where those not inclined toward science actually feel intimidated by the subjects. ThoughtCo tries to offer this encouragement, which may be less than encouraging to many:
Don't go into chemistry until you understand the basics of algebra. Geometry helps, too.
The dislike continues into adulthood; the New York Times published, “Why American College Students Hate Science”.
The effect is that, unlike gun control, taxation and immigration, a huge percentage of people are reluctant to challenge their leaders when it comes to virology and climatology.
The refrain, “you should do your own research,” is met with, “that’s what we’ve got the CDC for.”
“But there are other scientists who don’t agree.”
“Never saw them, must be quacks.”
“You should read the data and statistics they cite. For example …”
“Let’s talk about something else.”
But for the same reason that people react similarly to COVID claims and climate claims, people will suspect the narrative for one of being unreliable once they find the narrative for the other to be so. The more they hear that COVID vaccines actually increased the risk of death, in every age group, the more likely they’ll be to click on a link to a story with a title like, “World's top climate scientists told to 'cover up' the fact that the Earth's temperature hasn't risen for the last 15 years”.
3. To protect vulnerable adults from mandates
While the threat of losing one’s job or having to do an 8-hour work shift in a mask has dissipated for most, there are still parts of the population over which the federal government has sufficient control to enforce mandates, such as military personnel and prisoners, including Jan 6 defendants. Then, of course, there are those who will willingly get additional (so called “booster”) shots if COVID information remains monolithic in the media to which they are exposed.
4. To prevent the declaration of a new pandemic
If Americans accept blaming late stage cancer deaths on a virus, then there’s nothing to stop public health officials from announcing a new virus scare, developing a PCR test that comes up positive in some five percent or so of the population, and then switching the cause of death in around five percent of cancer, heart disease, flu and pneumonia cases to that new virus (without any increase in overall deaths other than in areas where hospital protocols suddenly change to the detriment of patients).
5. To get vaccine-injured people the help they need
There are some detoxification remedies that may help a person who has been injured by the COVID vaccine, but, obviously, only if the injured person realizes that their illness is not something that coincidentally started shortly after their vaccination but rather is due to the continued or past presence of vaccine ingredients in their bodies. AFLDS posts one such treatment regimen for the vaccine injured.
6. To hold the leaders accountable
The real deterrence of public officials and their allies in academia and media from again joining together to attack medical freedom is, of course, the enforcement of laws against deliberately misleading the public. Rabbi Yehoishophot Oliver explains,
Once public awareness reaches a critical point it becomes possible to hold the conspirators accountable. We need everyone to awaken to the complete corruption of the system so we can rebuild it in a much more constructive way.”
7. To protect babies from the jab
This one can be checked off as already accomplished. In New York, less than 1% of kids four and younger have been fully vaccinated.
